Process and rating points of the A-certificating of Best Value Europe
Criteria |
Rating points |
Objectives BV-E |
1: B+ certificate |
|
Verify that the candidate has theoretical basic knowledge of Best Value |
2: Performance Information (max 1 A4) |
|
Quickly and efficiently evaluate the ability of the candidate to Best Value to apply correctly and is potentially suitable for A certification. |
3: Article (max 8 A4) |
|
Assessing the candidate's ability to apply the Best Value Methodology (PIPS) and Philosophy (IMT / KSM) independently, is committed to the Best Value approach and is suitable for A certification. |
4: Interview / assessment |
|
Assessing whether candidate's understands and explains own article , being able to apply Best Value independently, is committed to the Best Value approach and is suitable for A certification. |
Further explanation of the article to be submitted:
-
Content page on the client side: A description of the phasing of the purchase process and training. The underlying documents (eg. purchase plan, guidelines, request for proposal, training, project plan, WRR etc.) must be attached as an attachment.
-
Content page on contractor side: A description of the request for proposal, guidelines, submittals, the training, the clarification phase and the execution phase. The underlying documents (eg vision / proposition document, registration document etc., project plan, WRR) must be attached as attachment.
-
Content article about BV application in organizations / teams / people. The underlying documents, such as studies / interviews must be attached as an attachment
-
The article should contain performance information about the results of the project or process in terms of time, money and quality to substantiate the effectiveness and efficiency of the Best Value application.
-
The article should be suitable for publication. This means that the article is evaluated on the characteristics of dominant information: relevant, verifiable, objective, substantiated with measurements (numbers, percentages), specific, concrete, easy to understand, not debatable, ensures transparency.
Workflow
The certification process's workflow explained:
Action |
Week |
days |
||
Interview |
0 |
|||
Consensus meeting article and PI |
BC |
-2 |
-14 |
|
Individual assesment article and PI |
BC |
-3 |
-21 |
|
E-mailed final article and PI to BVE |
candidate |
-4 |
-28 |
|
Documents of sufficient quality to send |
buddy |
|||
Concept documenst to buddy |
candidate |
|||
Buddy assignment ( 1 form the BC) |
Susan |
application date |
||
Application by candidate |
candidate |